Intero investigates your incidents and finds the root cause.
Your team supplies the facts and decides.
Describe what happened and attach the evidence. Intero asks the follow-up questions a seasoned investigator would, one at a time, then runs the investigation: every credible explanation tested against the evidence, every finding cited, every corrective action traced to a finding.
You get an investigation in minutes, and Intero keeps it current as new evidence and answers arrive. Your team answers what only they know, disputes any line they disagree with, and approves the report before anything is final.
Intero is graded against public CSB investigations, so you can see how its findings hold up against the official record.
The system you have wasn't built to investigate.
Your EHS platform stores incidents, routes CAPAs, and holds the audit trail. That work matters. Recording an investigation is a different job from doing one, and the AI added to those platforms mostly summarizes the report that was already written.
Intero is a system of intelligence, not a system of record.
The discipline of a real investigation, built in.
Evidence first. Every finding cited. Corrective actions that trace to a finding. Intero keeps every credible explanation open until the evidence rules it out, and a qualified person reviews and approves before anything is final.
The AI in a records platform
Summarizes the report someone already wrote.
Intero
Investigates from the evidence. It asks the follow-up questions a seasoned investigator would and names the evidence no one collected.
The AI in a records platform
Restates the root cause that was entered.
Intero
Tests every credible explanation against the evidence, and refuses boilerplate like “human error” without the mechanism behind it.
The AI in a records platform
Files corrective actions in a register.
Intero
Traces every action to a finding, with an owner, a due date, the evidence that closes it, and a measure that shows it worked.
The AI in a records platform
Asks you to take its output on trust.
Intero
Can be graded. Run a closed case through Intero and compare its report with your own, on the one incident you know best.
Five parts to every case.
Intero runs the same investigation on every incident, from the first account to an approved report. It works beside the EHS system you already use, or captures the incident itself.
The Case File
What happened, in the reporter’s own words, with photos, documents, scanned pages and video. Intero asks the follow-up questions one at a time and reads every item.
The Causal Analysis
Every credible explanation, each with a physical mechanism, tested row by row against the evidence. Barriers graded, contributing factors traced at four levels.
The Findings
Each cited to an exact quote or photo observation, with a calibrated confidence. A probable cause only when the evidence leaves one explanation standing.
The Hard Rules
Cite. Trace every action to a finding. Roles, never names. No boilerplate. Enforced on every analysis; a case that breaks one can’t be submitted.
The Signed Report
A qualified person approves. CAPAs go live in the tracker with an owner and a due date, and each is read back later: did the fix hold?
Judge it on your own incident.
Send us your last closed investigation report. Redacted is fine. Intero re-investigates it cold: the engine reads only the factual account and never sees your conclusions. Then you compare the two reports side by side.
You send a closed report
Any format, any system it came from. Redact names and identifiers. The engine works from roles, never names.
Intero re-investigates, cold
Your findings are withheld. Intero works from the factual account and the evidence alone: explanations tested, every finding cited, CAPAs traced to findings. It also names the evidence that was never collected.
We compare, side by side, with you
Your report next to Intero’s. Where they agree, where they differ, and what the record was missing. You judge it on the one incident you know best.
Your report
Root causes
Contributing factors
Corrective actions
Intero · cold re-investigation
Explanations tested
CAPAs · traced to findings
Evidence gaps named
How we lay out the comparison when we walk you through it. Your conclusions are shown for comparison only. Intero never reads them.
The only safety AI that can tell you how often it's right.
The U.S. Chemical Safety Board publishes its investigations in full. We run Intero on those same incidents, cold, and check its findings against the official root cause. The grade is public, and we keep it current as the set grows.
We frame every benchmark result as “re-derived the official finding,” never as a guarantee. The published scoreboard goes live once the current set is verified.
Every benchmark case is checked against the CSB's own published conclusion.
Intero reads your procedures and follows up on your fixes.
Every case is read against your own library. The SOPs, manuals and training records you upload are cited where they bear on what happened, beside the official rules for your jurisdiction where Intero holds them.
When a corrective action is finished, its owner is later asked whether the fix held, and Intero looks through the cases that came after for the same failure coming back. Ask Intero answers questions across every case you can see, and Insights shows where your incidents and actions are heading.
Your procedures
The documents in your library are read with each case and cited where they bear on what happened.
Your people’s own words
Every finding quotes your crew’s accounts exactly. Nothing is flattened into dropdown codes.
Fixes that held
Each finished action is read back. If a later case shows the same failure, the owner sees it beside the grade.
The investigation workspace is live and demoable today.
Test Intero on a closed caseIf you run HSE at an industrial company and this sounds like your problem, let's talk.
The AI proposes. Your team decides.
Intero drafts the investigation. A person reviews, edits, and signs every output before it is final. Nothing the AI produces stands on its own.
Intero proposes
It runs the analysis and drafts the findings and CAPAs, each cited to an exact quote or a photo observation.
Your team judges
Answer what only you know, dispute any line, edit or reject anything. The four hard rules are already enforced.
A person approves
Nothing is final until someone with approval rights signs it off. No action goes live without an owner your team chose.
Your data never trains AI models
Every output cites evidence
Every action has an owner your team chose
Your cases stay inside your organization